<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Business of Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/</link>
	<description>Connecting People With Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A kinder philosophy of success &#124; Benjamin Ellis</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-15459</link>
		<dc:creator>A kinder philosophy of success &#124; Benjamin Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1543#comment-15459</guid>
		<description>[...] experience that is an anachronism that has hung around too long. I&#8217;m inspired by people like Zarine of Just Giving, who&#8217;s view is that the CEO is at the bottom, not the top, of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] experience that is an anachronism that has hung around too long. I&#8217;m inspired by people like Zarine of Just Giving, who&#8217;s view is that the CEO is at the bottom, not the top, of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly Evans</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-12138</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1543#comment-12138</guid>
		<description>Long time ago, if that is how you see just post WWII a former US Army major set up a company named W.L.Gore.  Very innovative in many ways, including its structure and ways of managing- none too dissimilar to Justgiving.  The company continues to thrive an maintain its innovative spirit.  One of the reasons is its ability to grow in an organic fashion while maintaining human size- something that links to what is now termed Dunbar number but at the time came from the size of a military unit where a major is sure to know all names!

Similarly, in 1960s the Avis Car Rental was led by a guy by the name Townsend, who practiced similar method and wrote a book about it- one which my then 7y old daughter bought at a school fete (I must have been boring her at home about work!)- called &#039;Up the Organisation&#039;.  Among other innovations- he dispensed with HR department.

Finally, when Collins and Porras wrote their book &#039;Good to Great&#039; in early 1990s they found that the critical distinguishing factor for the firms that lasted long and maintained their position in a marketplace was the initial ethos and values that the founder spend time and effort to imbue in the enterprise.  Among the examples was HP- which is after so many changes and consolidations still very much around!

It is wonderful to see an entrepreneur in the mould of Anita Roddick in our midsts again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time ago, if that is how you see just post WWII a former US Army major set up a company named W.L.Gore.  Very innovative in many ways, including its structure and ways of managing- none too dissimilar to Justgiving.  The company continues to thrive an maintain its innovative spirit.  One of the reasons is its ability to grow in an organic fashion while maintaining human size- something that links to what is now termed Dunbar number but at the time came from the size of a military unit where a major is sure to know all names!</p>
<p>Similarly, in 1960s the Avis Car Rental was led by a guy by the name Townsend, who practiced similar method and wrote a book about it- one which my then 7y old daughter bought at a school fete (I must have been boring her at home about work!)- called &#8216;Up the Organisation&#8217;.  Among other innovations- he dispensed with HR department.</p>
<p>Finally, when Collins and Porras wrote their book &#8216;Good to Great&#8217; in early 1990s they found that the critical distinguishing factor for the firms that lasted long and maintained their position in a marketplace was the initial ethos and values that the founder spend time and effort to imbue in the enterprise.  Among the examples was HP- which is after so many changes and consolidations still very much around!</p>
<p>It is wonderful to see an entrepreneur in the mould of Anita Roddick in our midsts again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-11906</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1543#comment-11906</guid>
		<description>To re-use one of my favourite Malcom Muggeridge quotes, “All new news is old news happening to new people.”

The art of good management hasn&#039;t changed, but technology is making bad management easier to see through. It also has the potential to lead organisations towards better management practices, by encouraging transparency, accountability and trust. If it is used correctly that is.

I&#039;m not sure it is a democratisation as such (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://redcatco.com/blog/communication/1326/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Decision Making&lt;/a&gt;), but it does mandate good leadership skills, by making poor ones very obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To re-use one of my favourite Malcom Muggeridge quotes, “All new news is old news happening to new people.”</p>
<p>The art of good management hasn&#8217;t changed, but technology is making bad management easier to see through. It also has the potential to lead organisations towards better management practices, by encouraging transparency, accountability and trust. If it is used correctly that is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it is a democratisation as such (see <a href="http://redcatco.com/blog/communication/1326/" rel="nofollow">Social Decision Making</a>), but it does mandate good leadership skills, by making poor ones very obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/leadership/the-new-business-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-11892</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1543#comment-11892</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this - it was interesting and stimulating.  I agree that CSR is a charade - &lt;a href=&quot;http://patrickhadfield.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/the-corporation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;although possibly for different reasons&lt;/a&gt;.  I am not sure that &quot;maximising shareholder value&quot; is outdated - it is just the way one gets there is through customers, employees and colleagues: you need these people on your side, they are the route to business.

I am not sure that any of this is particularly &quot;new&quot; though: freeing up employees through management flat structures has been around for decades, and works well until employees do things managers disagree with (at which point command and control suddenly becomes the norm!).

I think what is new is the way in which technology can facilitate and enable these changes: I see real democraticisation of organisations as one of the outcomes of social media; indeed, I think it will happen whether managers want it or not, and they need to start thinking how it will affect their business models before they are changed one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this &#8211; it was interesting and stimulating.  I agree that CSR is a charade &#8211; <a href="http://patrickhadfield.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/the-corporation/" rel="nofollow">although possibly for different reasons</a>.  I am not sure that &#8220;maximising shareholder value&#8221; is outdated &#8211; it is just the way one gets there is through customers, employees and colleagues: you need these people on your side, they are the route to business.</p>
<p>I am not sure that any of this is particularly &#8220;new&#8221; though: freeing up employees through management flat structures has been around for decades, and works well until employees do things managers disagree with (at which point command and control suddenly becomes the norm!).</p>
<p>I think what is new is the way in which technology can facilitate and enable these changes: I see real democraticisation of organisations as one of the outcomes of social media; indeed, I think it will happen whether managers want it or not, and they need to start thinking how it will affect their business models before they are changed one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

