<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating a Bad Social Media Habitat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redcatco.com/blog/marketing/creating-a-bad-social-media-habitat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/marketing/creating-a-bad-social-media-habitat/</link>
	<description>Connecting People With Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 07:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Controversy In Blogging and Social Media</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/marketing/creating-a-bad-social-media-habitat/comment-page-1/#comment-94541</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Controversy In Blogging and Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1655#comment-94541</guid>
		<description>[...] in 2009, Habitat UK, allegedly tweeted about their products using trending hashtags in their tweets.  That might not have been so bad if some of the hashtags [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2009, Habitat UK, allegedly tweeted about their products using trending hashtags in their tweets.  That might not have been so bad if some of the hashtags [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Search of the Habitat Intern &#124; redcatco blog</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/marketing/creating-a-bad-social-media-habitat/comment-page-1/#comment-14646</link>
		<dc:creator>In Search of the Habitat Intern &#124; redcatco blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1655#comment-14646</guid>
		<description>[...] seems an age since posting about Habitat UK&#8217;s mis-steps into Twitter. Since that post, Habit have apologised &#8211; although not yet on the place where the deed was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems an age since posting about Habitat UK&#8217;s mis-steps into Twitter. Since that post, Habit have apologised &#8211; although not yet on the place where the deed was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://redcatco.com/blog/marketing/creating-a-bad-social-media-habitat/comment-page-1/#comment-13794</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redcatco.com/?p=1655#comment-13794</guid>
		<description>It appears that Habitat got the message:

&quot;We would like to make a very sincere apology to any users who were offended by last week&#039;s activity on Twitter.&quot;

&quot;The top ten trending topics were pasted into hashtags without checking with us and apparently without verifying what all of the tags referred to.&quot;

&quot;This was absolutely not authorised by Habitat. We were shocked when we discovered what happened and are very sorry for the offence that has been caused.&quot;

More in &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8116869.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;. Habitat is still refusing to say if the incident was an internal employee, or an external agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Habitat got the message:</p>
<p>&#8220;We would like to make a very sincere apology to any users who were offended by last week&#8217;s activity on Twitter.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The top ten trending topics were pasted into hashtags without checking with us and apparently without verifying what all of the tags referred to.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This was absolutely not authorised by Habitat. We were shocked when we discovered what happened and are very sorry for the offence that has been caused.&#8221;</p>
<p>More in <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8116869.stm" rel="nofollow">this article</a>. Habitat is still refusing to say if the incident was an internal employee, or an external agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Served from: redcatco.com @ 2012-05-23 19:16:08 by W3 Total Cache -->
